Total Recall01 August 2012, 10:37 (9 months ago)
Wanted to get a feeling for what everybody thinks about the Total Recall remake that is coming out this week. And if anybody is actually planing on spending money to see it.
Personally, I hope the film is a HUGE flop at the box office so that maybe Hollywood will finally get the message to stop remaking classics. You can't improve on an already great film. Especially by trying to add to or change an already brilliant script and story by throwing 10's of millions of dollars worth of special effects at it. I have yet to see a "remake" that was anywhere near as good as the original. More often than not they completely ruin it by either trying to add back story to the original material. Or they just completely change the story and add little "see what we did there" references to the original. They should just digitally remaster the originals and add remastered digital sound then re-release the originals in theaters. There are tons of movies I would pay +$10 to see again in all their glory on the big screen. I am betting there are plenty of others that would too. What do you guys think? Edit** So now that the movie has been released, I want to hear from some you who have seen it and what your opinion is. How does it hold it's own compared to the original? Would you recommend it to others? 10 replies before
zombiestew288
Wanted to get a feeling for what everybody thinks about the Total Recall remake that is coming out this week. And if anybody is actually planing on spending money to see it. Personally, I hope the film is a HUGE flop at the box office so that maybe Hollywood will finally get the message to stop remaking classics. You can't improve on an already great film. Especially by trying to add to or change an already brilliant script and story by throwing 10's of millions of dollars worth of special effects at it. I have yet to see a "remake" that was anywhere near as good as the original. More often than not they completely ruin it by either trying to add back story to the original material. Or they just completely change the story and add little "see what we did there" references to the original. They should just digitally remaster the originals and add remastered digital sound then re-release the originals in theaters. There are tons of movies I would pay +$10 to see again in all their glory on the big screen. I am betting there are plenty of others that would too. What do you guys think? I gotta disagree with you for the most part on remakes, maybe I haven't seen enough bad ones, but our culture has changed soo much that it's sometimes hard to relate to alot of things in older movies. They were good in their time but going back and watching them now, they just don't hold up well IMO, and I'm not just talking about visuals & special FX, but dialogue, action choreography, etc. Good examples are the first Star Wars movies, everyone(including me) seems to agree they were much better than the recent "prequels"(kindofa remake) but watching them again I can't help but notice how cheesey the dialogue and action can get. Seriously, my grandpa could have fought better than Luke. Another good example is the Batman series, go watch the old ones again after the Dark Knight series and lol@robin. I think remakes, if done right, have the potential to take the source material to a whole new level.. e.g. The recent remake of Battlestar Galactica(TV series) IMO set the bar very high(at least in the first seasons)and it shows how great a remake can be. I'll definitely give you Battlestar. But let's face it. The original really kinda sucked. 70's TV kinda sucked on the whole. It has some campy nostalgia value, but that's about it. And a great concept.
While the newer Batman movies maybe better on sheer production, I still prefer Keaton's Batman and Bruce Wayne to Bale's. I personally wouldn't mind a remake if they kept the same story and basic script. Just updated the the production value and some dialogue to make it relevant. But they never do that. When you have a story that is already as good as this one is just leave it alone. It's like repainting the Mona Lisa with photo shop so you can add in why she has that peculiar look on her face and the idiot masses fawning all over it. Last edited by Wldsthrnboy6905, 9 months ago Well, my opinion is Hollywood is saving $$$ on buying new screenplays. They are also running out of new ideas. I'm sure that's been mentioned many times before, but there's one more.
If they do a remake CORRECTLY, it's a blessing! But it's nothing new....look at how many times "The Lost World" has been remade, since 1925(?) Or, King Kong? Or "Ben Hur"? Just examples of good and bad in the industry. Oh....I never go to the movies. Not with my KAT here! Last edited by RonthePirate158845, 6 months ago True, Swarzenneger on mars was a good take. Looking at wikipedia it could have been a major adventure into projectile vomiting. Richard Dreyfuss as Quaid? No friggin way.
Noway Richard Dreyfuss lol. But Harrison Ford or Tommy Lee Jones would have been very very interesting to see in 1990.
SirSeedsAlot52698
Let's hope they aren't just trying to cash in on the old brand. I certainly would enjoy a decently made upgrade especially if it had xenomorphs eating the bad guys.
Lol, Second that
![]() RonthePirate158845
Well, my opinion is Hollywood is saving $$$ on buying new screenplays. They are also running out of new ideas. I'm sure that's been mentioned many times before, but there's one more.
If they do a remake CORRECTLY, it's a blessing! But it's nothing new....look at how many times "The Lost World" has been remade, since 1925(?) Or, King Kong? Or "Ben Hur"? Just examples of good and bad in the industry. Oh....I never go to the movies. Not with my KAT here! I don't think Hollywood is running out of ideas. I think they are running out of originality. Just like nearly every other industry, they have just about completely stopped taking risks on anything original. They pay for names and that's about it. That's why I am a fan of torrenting. You can find independent and foreign films that most of us North Americans would never even know exist because the distribution companies won't make $400 million.
|








